data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f71c/9f71c2efe886ef184008b13c15bffe250bd8a233" alt=""
Although the concept was initially discussed in India in the year 2003 yet till now we are not clear what exactly an e-court is. Whether for ignorance or deliberate design both the government of India and judiciary in India are portraying a totally wrong picture about establishment of e-courts in India. For instance, initially the Gujarat State claimed that they established the first e-court of India and subsequently New Delhi declared that it has established the first ever e-court of India.
The bigger question is who is telling the truth and who is ignorant? I think the real answer lies in the misunderstanding among the stakeholders. The real problem is that India is deliberately not willing to understand the difference between a computerised court and an e-court. While India has done a good job at the front of establishment of computerised courts yet when it comes to e-courts it failed absolutely to establish even a single one.
India must understand that e-courts are much more that mere connectivity and computerisation of traditional courts. The moment e-filing, presentation, contest and adjudication of the cases in an online environment would start; India would surely be capable of establishing e-courts.
It would be a good idea to engage world renowned experts of the field for establishment of e-courts in India. Till now India has been extending the term of e-court committee year after year with virtually no results.
If this is the vision of Law Minister Mr. Veerappa Moily for legal and judicial reforms in India, I am sorry to say that not only it is faulty but also devoid of any merits. It would not bring any results except wastage of public money.