Showing posts with label Internet Censorship In India. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Internet Censorship In India. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Video Conferencing Is A Troubled Technology In India

Information and communication technology (ICT) is increasingly posing challenges before Indian government. Sometimes, novel situations and challenges are posed before Indian government that they have to resolve. This is the reason why companies like Google and Facebook are fighting legal battles in India.

There is no second opinion that India is anxious to control information technology. Measures like Internet censorship, websites blocking, etc have been devised by India to take control of technology. However, no matter howsoever hard Indian government would try; technological issues would keep on teasing Indian government.

The latest to add to this list is use of video conferencing in India. The recent episode of Rajasthan government and Rajasthan police not allowing the video conferencing of Salman Rushdie affirms this struggle.

We have no dedicated video conferencing laws and regulations in India. Obviously, we have no dedicated video conferencing blocking laws in India as well. In the absence of a clear cut law, Indian government is following procedures that do not justify its stand.

There is an urgent need to formulate sufficient rules or guidelines in this regard so that illegal vide conferencing blocking in India can be curbed.

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

India Is Anxious To Control Information Technology

This is the updated version of my previous article titled India is desperate to control technology. It has been censored by Google through manual action penalty so it requires reposting for the larger interests of viewers and netizens.

This post has also been censored by Digital Journal where it was originally posted through the infamous trump card of spam communication used by Internet intermediaries and online community.

Of late, spam communications has been used as a façade to violate speech and expression right. It is high time to ensure civil liberties protection in cyberspace as merely saying that Internet access is a human right by United Nations is not going to serve any purpose. If posts are censored by Google after posting, freedom of speech and expression is definitely violated and so are human rights in cyberspace.

Adoption of information and communication technology (ICT) by Indian government seems to be a herculean task. Naturally, if India cannot understand the technology, it would prefer to block the same as whatever we do not understand we fear of the same.

This holds true for India. Instead of befriending technology, Indian government is considering the same its enemy. From Internet censorship to e-surveillance, Indian government has not left any stone unturned.

India has been struggling to deal with technological issues for long. Unable to deal with the same in a constitutional manner, India adopted measures that are detrimental for the growth of the same. These measures can only increase e-corruption and they are detrimental to the interest of India in the long run.

The worst affected area seems to be the cyber law of India incorporated in the information technology act 2000 (IT Act 2000). Cyber law for social media in India is draconian in nature that forces social media websites and Internet intermediaries in India to follow Indian government’s directions.

Recently, Internet intermediaries in India were asked to pre screen contents of users. Companies like Google opposed such move of Indian government. However, this does not stopped Internet censorship in India, e-surveillance in India, etc. Further, even incidences of manual action and censorship and blocking of accounts were witnessed regarding companies like Google and Facebook. In an interesting development Yahoo took Indian government to court over e-surveillance.

It seems human rights in cyberspace need to be strengthened and protected. United Nations needs to step in to prevent encroachment upon civil liberties in cyberspace. Protection of human rights in Indian cyberspace also needs to be taken seriously by Indian government. European Council has already expressed its concerns for cyber attacks and political pressures upon cyber dissidents. It is working in the direction of protecting privacy rights and free speech in cyberspace.

The recent cyber law trends in India and cyber security trends in India are pointing towards reformation of Indian cyber law. Further, even a constitutional phone tapping law in India is urgently required. The year 2011 was a bad year for legislative reforms in India and I hope the year 2012 would not be same.

Monday, January 2, 2012

India Is Desperate To Control Technology

Adoption of information and communication technology (ICT) by Indian government seems to be a herculean task. Naturally, if India cannot understand the technology, it would prefer to block the same as whatever we do not understand we fear of the same.

This holds true for India. Instead of befriending technology, Indian government is considering the same its enemy. From Internet censorship to e-surveillance, Indian government has not left any stone unturned.

India has been struggling to deal with technological issues for long. Unable to deal with the same in a constitutional manner, India adopted measures that are detrimental for the growth of the same. These measures can only increase e-corruption and they are detrimental to the interest of India in the long run.

The worst affected area seems to be the cyber law of India incorporated in the information technology act 2000 (IT Act 2000). Cyber law for social media in India is draconian in nature that forces social media websites and Internet intermediaries in India to follow Indian government’s directions.

Recently, Internet intermediaries in India were asked to pre screen contents of users. Companies like Google opposed such move of Indian government. However, this does not stopped Internet censorship in India, e-surveillance in India, etc. Further, even incidences of manual action and censorship and blocking of accounts were witnessed regarding companies like Google and Facebook. In an interesting development Yahoo took Indian government to court over e-surveillance.

It seems human rights in cyberspace need to be strengthened and protected. United Nations needs to step in to prevent encroachment upon civil liberties in cyberspace. Protection of human rights in Indian cyberspace also needs to be taken seriously by Indian government. European Council has already expressed its concerns for cyber attacks and political pressures upon cyber dissidents. It is working in the direction of protecting privacy rights and free speech in cyberspace.

The recent cyber law trends in India and cyber security trends in India are pointing towards reformation of Indian cyber law. Further, even a constitutional phone tapping law in India is urgently required. The year 2011 was a bad year for legislative reforms in India and I hope the year 2012 would not be same.

Friday, December 9, 2011

Cyber Attacks And Political Pressures Upon Cyber Dissidents Worries European Council

Human rights protection in cyberspace is an important aspect of civil liberties protection these days. However, despite the significance of this issue, both national and international governments ate shying away from protecting human rights in cyberspace. On the other hand they are actively engaging in e-surveillance, Internet censorship, etc that violates various civil liberties in cyberspace. Throughout the world technology has been increasingly used to violate human rights in cyberspace.

In India various individuals and companies have already sued Indian government for violating their civil liberties in real world as well as cyber world. A writ petition for protection of privacy rights in India is already pending before the Supreme Court of India. The way Indian executive is playing with the Constitution of India, the day is not far when there would be a complete “constitutional failure” in India.

Similarly, Yahoo has already taken Indian government to court over illegal demands of e-surveillance by union home ministry of India. In its petition, Yahoo has emphasised upon the right to privacy of a company that stores such sensitive data and questioned as to what extent authorities can coerce it to part with the information considered necessary to either track terror perpetrators or thwart future attacks.

India has demanded companies like Google and Facebook to censor user contents. Indian government has asked the Internet intermediaries like Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, Facebook, etc to pre screen offensive contents before they are posted. This has happened because there are no well defined Internet intermediary laws in India deals with cyber due diligence requirements of these companies in India. Google has already communicated its dissatisfaction with the Internet intermediary law of India.

Further, censorship of Internet in India and blocking of websites in India is very common even without any constitutional and civil liberty safeguards. Further, Indian government is now openly acknowledging surveillance of Internet traffic in India. In fact, measures to fight websites blocking and Internet censorship have also been suggested by few.

In these circumstances, protecting human rights in cyberspace is not an easy task and most of the nations are not willing to do so for their own e-surveillance reasons. Although UN has declared that access to Internet is a human right yet all countries are openly violating this right. Efforts of United Nations to protect human rights in cyberspace are still half hearted and slow. UN must protect human rights in cyberspace in widest possible manner.

Lack of privacy laws and procedural safeguards have already stalled the national intelligence grid (Natgrid) project of India. Intelligence work is no excuse for non accountability that is commonly available to Indian intelligence and security agencies of India.

Similarly, absence of data privacy laws in India has created a big trouble for the Aadhar project of India. Chances are very great that Aadhar project of India may be scrapped and it must be scrapped in its present form and structure.

In these troubled situations, the council of Europe is taking many pro active steps to strengthen human rights protection in cyberspace. The Council of Europe has recently released a resolution titled “Abuse of State Secrecy and National Security: Obstacles to Parliamentary and Judicial Scrutiny of Human Rights Violations”. This is a significant step to reduce the blanket use of national security façade to violate civil liberties.

Now Council of Europe has issued an alert to European countries about the risk to free speech by cyber attacks and political pressure on internet platforms, internet service providers (ISPs), independent media, whistleblowers, human rights defenders and political dissidents.

The Council's Committee of Ministers issued a Declaration expressing concern over pressure being exerted on internet companies and ISPs to tighten controls on internet content, which supports a recent EU Court of Justice ruling that ISP filters are prohibited under European law.

The Council is also worried about the impact of cyber attacks, particularly Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks, on advocates of free speech, which it sees as a relatively new way that this right is being violated.

The Council alerted member states about their potential violation of Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights if they exert pressure on ISPs and internet platforms, or participate in cyber attacks against whistleblowers and other new media.

Let us hope that other nations, including India, would take clue from these developments happening in Europe and consider changing their laws and attitudes accordingly.

Thursday, July 1, 2010

Unethical And Illegal SEO Activities Regarding UIDAI Are Happening And Google Seems To Be Indifferent

It has come to our knowledge that controversial topics regarding projects like Natgrid, CCTNS, etc in general and Aadhar project in particular have been systematically filtered at the Google news search. Surprisingly, all the topics pertaining to unique identification authority of India (UIDAI) and carrying the term UIDAI are dumped deep into the Google news search engine irrespective of their relevance and quality.

Since Google is aware of this issue and this cannot happen without its consent, we can safely presume that Google is also involved in this process. We would post more details very soon.

The latest article on breach of public trust by Indian government has been dumped once again.

Also see this CIO article.

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Google Must Choose And Declare Its Priority Now

Google has been “cooperating” with law enforcement and security agencies all over the World. To perform its cooperating task more adequately it is making every possible effort to get the relevant data of its users.

As a result, the privacy and anonymity of its users is more vulnerable to legal and illegal disclosures. At last Google objected to the omnipresent censorship by Chinese authorities and declared that it would withdraw from China.

This situation may also arise at other places of the World, including India. However, the bigger questions are whether Google would cease to operate from China and if it does not cease its operations than whether it would no longer censor the results from Chinese netizens, says Praveen Dalal.

If Google does not exercise either of these options than the entire episode would be branded as a “gimmick” to increase “commercial gain” in China and nothing more.

Recently, Google was in controversy for showing Indian Territory differently in three different parts of the World. So much so that Indian Government decided to ban Google maps in India.

Some observers have remarked that by showing different results in different parts of the World Google is trying to make happy all concerned. This smacks “double standards” on the part of Google and only shows that it is more interested in commercial gains than all other practices objected to by it.

SOURCE: GROUND REPORT

Saturday, January 16, 2010

The Irrational Cyber Laws Of The World

The Google’s episode regarding China’s censorship shows the growing hunger of various nations for Internet censorship and e-surveillance. India is no different from China when it comes to “Internet Censorship” and “E-Surveillance”, though the extent and degree may be somewhat lesser. The Information Technology Act 2000 (IT Act 2000) is the sole cyber law of India that was amended by the Information Technology Act 2008 (IT Act 2008). From here starts the real problem.

According to Praveen Dalal, Managing Partner of Perry4Law and the leading Techno-Legal Expert of India, “The IT Act 2008 made India a “Safe Heaven” for cyber criminals on the one hand and an “Endemic E-Surveillance Society” and “Internet Censorship State” on the other hand. It seems the main aim of the proposed IT Act 2008 was to strengthen the “Internet Censorship” and “E-Surveillance Capabilities” of India.

With the passage of IT Act 2008 India has now officially become an endemic e-surveillance society. The amendments have provided unregulated, unconstitutional and arbitrary e-surveillance and Internet censorship powers to Government of India and its agencies and instrumentalities, says Praveen Dalal. The fact is that India has become an E-Police State, states the ICT Trends of India 2009.

Surprisingly, Minister of State for Communication Sachin Pilot believes that Indian cyber law is strong enough to meet the challenges posed by technology-assisted terrorism and cyber-terrorism. It seems he has not gone through the present IT Act 2000 after its 2008 amendments.

Some observers in India have rejoiced the exit of Google from China believing that it may be a good opportunity for India. However, they fail to understand the “ground reality” that India is no different from China when it comes to Internet Censorship and E-Surveillance. If India does not abdicate its alliance to Internet censorship and e-surveillance similar incidence may happen in India as well.